<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sawickipedia &#187; fred wilson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sawickipedia.com/category/fred-wilson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sawickipedia.com</link>
	<description>a geek&#039;s take on the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>winer&#8217;s on to something here &#8211; open source feedburner that is</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/08/01/winers-on-to-something-here-open-source-feedburner-that-is/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/08/01/winers-on-to-something-here-open-source-feedburner-that-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dave winer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/08/01/winers-on-to-something-here-open-source-feedburner-that-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Winer has been bloggingabout feedburner in response to Google&#8217;s acquisition of the company.  Dave is concerned about how Google might co-opt feedburner to their benefit &#8211; ie. special tie-in&#8217;s to google reader for instance that might put other readers at a disadvantage (hmmm sounds a lot like what Microsoft has been accused of with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Winer has been <a href="http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/08/01/whatAboutFeedburner.html">blogging</a>about feedburner in response to Google&#8217;s acquisition of the company.  Dave is concerned about how Google might co-opt feedburner to their benefit &#8211; ie. special tie-in&#8217;s to google reader for instance that might put other readers at a disadvantage (hmmm sounds a lot like what Microsoft has been accused of with regards to Office and Windows integration).  </p>
<p>Fred Wilson &#8211; VC extraordinaire (this is a compliment) and investor in feedburner (seriously has there been a better web 2.0 hit rate then Fred&#8217;s?) <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AVc/~3/136175090/feedburner-and-.html">believes</a> Dave is just whining unnecessarily - that if Google were to muck with Feedburner folks will just switch their feed aggregator to a Feedburner competitor.</p>
<p>My two cents (though probably only worth 1/10th of that):  I am in Dave&#8217;s camp.  I don&#8217;t think Google will do anything maliciously, but I do worry about the unintended consequences of google trying to improve the google reader-feedburner-analytics integration.  Integration points will go undocumented (because that happens with all software which is what I think happened with Windows per my earlier comment) and the marketplace will be forced to choose between Google&#8217;s &#8220;closed&#8221; platform and everything else.</p>
<p>Re: Fred&#8217;s point &#8211; I actually don&#8217;t think switching is a realistic alternative.  The switching costs are too high (as a VC I think Fred understands the value of high switching costs since it comes up in every competitive review I&#8217;ve ever been involved in).  My guess is that 80% of anyone&#8217;s RSS subscribers are passive and 20% active.  My assumption is the 20% who are active would take the time to switch the RSS feed, but you would likely lose 80% of your subscribers by switching feeds.  Is it worth the risk of losing perhaps 80% of one&#8217;s blog subs?  For most likely not.  For an analogy look at how many people switching cell carriers before number portability &#8211; essentially none.  One&#8217;s RSS URL is likely the equivalent of a cell phone number &#8211; change it and you lose touch with your network.  So as much as Fred says that we can all just leave Feedburner &#8211; I think he&#8217;s wrong &#8211; for the moment we&#8217;re stuck at the mercy of Google.  And being any more at the mercy of any company &#8211; Google included &#8211; is not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/08/01/winers-on-to-something-here-open-source-feedburner-that-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>it&#8217;s a bird, it&#8217;s a plane, no it&#8217;s super-vc!</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/14/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-no-its-super-vc/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/14/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-no-its-super-vc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 18:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fred wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/05/14/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-no-its-super-vc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noted New York VC Fred Wilson&#8217;s comment on his non-involvement with any of the purported machinations going on with wallstrip, the online video show, raises a great point.  VC&#8217;s are not super-men/women or the masters of the universe that perhaps the public might perceive.  In almost every case, the credit for success and failure of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted New York VC Fred Wilson&#8217;s <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AVc/~3/116538546/getting_the_sto.html">comment</a> on his non-involvement with any of the purported machinations going on with wallstrip, the online video show, raises a great point.  VC&#8217;s are not super-men/women or the masters of the universe that perhaps the public might perceive.  In almost every case, the credit for success and failure of a vc-backed startup goes to the team.  Yes, VC&#8217;s can stick their fingers and muck up the works but that&#8217;s only because founders let them &#8211; at least in my experience.  So the next time you see a huge success, congratulate the team, not the VC&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/14/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-no-its-super-vc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>lies, damned lies and statistics</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/06/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/06/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 17:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fred wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul kedrosky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/05/06/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred Wilson&#8217;s post about the age of entrepreneurs in his portfolio was interesting amid his concern of a potential bias in the age of entreprenuers.  But more importantly is Paul Kedrosky&#8217;s rebuttal showing a survey of the age of entrepreneurs which shows a distribution that is pretty consistent with the age distribution of the workforce.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Wilson&#8217;s <a href="http://http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AVc/~3/113559379/the_mid_life_en.html">post</a> about the age of entrepreneurs in his portfolio was interesting amid his concern of a potential bias in the age of entreprenuers.  But more importantly is Paul Kedrosky&#8217;s <a href="http://http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/InfectiousGreed/~3/114172723/the_ageentrepre.html">rebuttal</a> showing a survey of the age of entrepreneurs which shows a distribution that is pretty consistent with the age distribution of the workforce.  The moral of the story &#8211; giving a stat without a context is the easiest way in the world to misrepresent the point of the statistic.  In this case, Fred wasn&#8217;t trying to mislead anyone, but his concerns about whether he was hitting a mid-life crisis might have been assuaged he had been looking at the distribution the way Paul did.  Context is everything when it comes to stats. </p>
<p> Of course I just gave away the oldest marketing trick in the book when it comes to stats when trying to paint a favorable picture to an audience <img src='http://sawickipedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p> <img align="middle" width="725" src="http://www.kedrosky.com/images/gem-age.gif" alt="Age Distribution" height="493" style="width: 725px; height: 493px" title="Age Distribution" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/05/06/lies-damned-lies-and-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
