<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sawickipedia &#187; facebook apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sawickipedia.com/category/facebook-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sawickipedia.com</link>
	<description>a geek&#039;s take on the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter the Open Source Social Platform and Command Line</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2009/01/12/twitter-the-open-source-social-platform-and-command-live/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2009/01/12/twitter-the-open-source-social-platform-and-command-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[f8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the story of how the Facebook dev platform is sooo 2007, while Twitter &#8211; as a platform and social command line &#8211; will be the story of 2009.  Twitter&#8217;s openness as an app platform could make it the default development platform for community apps.
Facebook: The King of 2007
The incredible popularity of facebook&#8217;s dev [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the story of how the Facebook dev platform is sooo 2007, while Twitter &#8211; as a platform and social command line &#8211; will be the story of 2009.  Twitter&#8217;s openness as an app platform could make it the default development platform for community apps.</p>
<p><strong>Facebook: The King of 2007</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Facebook 2007 King" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3396/3190993246_c00e099f80_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="88" />The incredible popularity of facebook&#8217;s dev platform from it&#8217;s launch in May of 2007 &#8211; shown by both from the huge number of 3rd party app developers as the incredible amount of users &#8211; provides firm evidence there is a huge market for social applications.  Users want to engage with other users both friends and the like minded public and platforms and applications that offer that functionality will be very successful.</p>
<p>Despite a platform that was generating 25 billion page views a month with a user base of 25+ million a month, Facebook decided to pull back.  Facebook decided it didn&#8217;t want to be a personal billboard service where a user could express themselves with badges from any number of apps.  Facebook is now a controlled sandbox where only certain things are allowed.  Facebook wants to be a personal automated rolodex with built in messaging &amp; annoucements (aka news feed).  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with facebook&#8217;s chosen direction (except for the fact they pulled the rug out from thousands of app developers but that&#8217;s a different story).  Even just as a super, automated personal CRM, facebook is is a hugely valuable business.</p>
<p>In the wake of Facebook&#8217;s changes, the opportunity for a truly open, flexible, non-walled garden social platform presents itself.  Myspace as the social expression platform makes sense except Myspace seems to have evolved into the Fan Club platform &#8211; again a valuable market but it is what it is. But what has happened is that given</p>
<p><strong>Twitter: The King of 2009</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Twitter Crown" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3086/3190168135_5e15d96a32_t.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="90" />If there is an open source social platform &#8211; it&#8217;s Twitter. There are a minimum set of rules other then the 140 character messaging limitation. There are no limits on who and how often you message folks who follow you.  All the apps built on Twitter are by default open &#8211; as all tweeted items are in the public Twitter domain.  Thus all commands, messages, actions, reactions cause Twitter to look and feel like a public command line.  Twitter is not about private back channel api&#8217;s.  For instance, Stocktwits might have popularized the $stock symbol short hand, but it doesn&#8217;t own it.  Any other app can take advantage of the $ short hand even co-opting <a href="http://stocktwits.com">Stocktwits</a> audience.  <a href="http://tipjoy.com">Tipjoy</a> is popularizing the command &#8220;p&#8221; for micropayments and so on.  And what&#8217;s great about the open command line model &#8211; Twitter isn&#8217;t dictating functions from inside the kremlin it&#8217;s letting its users and developers do it for them.</p>
<p>Twitter is now a powerful platform for social apps and the folks who figure out how to build popular apps and communities on top of it will do very well for themselves.  Facebook might have the social graph, Myspace the fan clubs, but Twitter will have the truly social apps.</p>
<p><script src="http://s.bit.ly/bitlypreview.js"></script></p>
<p><script src="http://s.bit.ly/bitlypreview.js"></script></p>
<p><script src="http://s.bit.ly/bitlypreview.js"></script></p>
<p><script src="http://s.bit.ly/bitlypreview.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2009/01/12/twitter-the-open-source-social-platform-and-command-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>valleywag calls it &#8211; facebook is the new microsoft</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/30/valleywag-calls-it-facebook-is-the-new-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/30/valleywag-calls-it-facebook-is-the-new-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dave mcclure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valleywag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/07/30/valleywag-calls-it-facebook-is-the-new-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valleywag &#8211; one of my favorite daily tech reads (please owen start covering the scene here in seattle) &#8211; posts what I believe a lot of folks are wondering &#8211; is facebook the new microsoft?  Facebook is following the Microsoft development platform playbook (as discussed here previously) with their F8 application development platform.  Suddently there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valleywag &#8211; one of my favorite daily tech reads (please owen start covering the scene here in seattle) &#8211; posts what I believe a lot of folks are wondering &#8211; <a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/valleywag/full/~3/138899141/developers-beware-facebook-really-is-the-new-microsoft-283941.php">is facebook the new microsoft</a>?  Facebook is following the Microsoft development platform playbook (<a href="http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/07/10/scobles-right-about-microsoft-and-apple/">as discussed here previously</a>) with their F8 application development platform.  Suddently there are hundreds of ISV&#8217;s running around creating new facebook apps much like Microsoft was ultimately able to create hundreds of thousands of ISV&#8217;s for Windows.   However for much of its history though Microsoft was notorious for suposedly eating its young (the ISV&#8217;s) and their custom applications (for us old timers who doesn&#8217;t remember the bloom county version called Microsquash?).   As Owen Thomas from Valleywag writes - Facebook developers, you&#8217;ve been put on notice.</p>
<p>My point isn&#8217;t necessarily to rain on the FB app parade as I think it&#8217;s got a ton of opportunity and have plenty of ideas for apps myself.   What&#8217;s interesting is that just last week I had a very similar conversation with a VC friend of mine.  My VC friend is awfully concerned about FB eating its young.  His counsel on investment ideas around FB apps is &#8211; be very careful.  He just can&#8217;t believe that FB will allow ISV&#8217;s to make unlimited amounts of money without FB getting a big cut.  And if FB gets a big cut, then my VC friend is concerned as to whether there&#8217;s enough money on the table for the app developer to make it big financially.</p>
<p>And if not, then FB will just eats its young and make the money themselves since there is nothing to stop them.  Just a reminder that as much as Scoble and Dave McClure are smoking the FB crack-pipe (and to an extent rightfully so), all of us looking at FB as the new startup business playground need to think about the risks that the current environment might contain. </p>
<p>OK you may now return to your favorite FB hype-fest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/30/valleywag-calls-it-facebook-is-the-new-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>scoble&#8217;s right again &#8211; facebook apps need some work</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/12/scobles-right-again-facebook-apps-need-some-work/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/12/scobles-right-again-facebook-apps-need-some-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/07/12/scobles-right-again-facebook-apps-need-some-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scoble beat me to the punch today with his post lamenting on how many apps on facebook just don&#8217;t work.  I had the same experience playing with a bunch of apps over the past few days.  And looking at my news feed I am noticing that ratio of removed apps to installed apps is running [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scoble beat me to the punch today with <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/07/12/the-biggest-problem-for-facebooks-app-platform/">his post </a>lamenting on how many apps on facebook just don&#8217;t work.  I had the same experience playing with a bunch of apps over the past few days.  And looking at my news feed I am noticing that ratio of removed apps to installed apps is running about 1:1.  It will be interesting to see how quickly the apps evolve and improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/12/scobles-right-again-facebook-apps-need-some-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>appaholic &#8211; the facebook app billboard</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/appaholic-the-facebook-app-billboard/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/appaholic-the-facebook-app-billboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/07/11/appaholic-the-facebook-app-billboard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another thing &#8211; thanks for dave mcclure for pointing this out for me today &#8211; great resource for fb app research &#8211; appaholic.com - check it out.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another thing &#8211; thanks for dave mcclure for pointing this out for me today &#8211; great resource for fb app research &#8211; <a href="http://appaholic.com">appaholic.com </a>- check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/appaholic-the-facebook-app-billboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>facebook apps &#8211; here, there and everywhere</title>
		<link>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/facebook-apps-here-there-and-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/facebook-apps-here-there-and-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sawicki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dave mcclure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lookery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott rafer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sawickipedia.com/blog/2007/07/11/facebook-apps-here-there-and-everywhere/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook is quite the buzz these days in startup land especially since they opened up their app platform (something that those of us in online marketing have been begging for years for fwiw &#8211; hint, hint, wink, wink FIM).  For those building consumer web services you know absolutely need to understand facebook and think long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook is quite the buzz these days in startup land especially since they opened up their app platform (something that those of us in online marketing have been begging for years for fwiw &#8211; hint, hint, wink, wink FIM).  For those building consumer web services you know absolutely need to understand facebook and think long and hard about your facebook application strategy (just like in 2006 you needed to think long and hard about your myspace widget strategy).  So we&#8217;ve been down this road before.  The main difference is that Facebook is trying to allow it&#8217;s application providers actually build real businesses around the apps!  I know shocking!</p>
<p>My buddy Dave McClure does a great writeup around initial thinking about facebook application marketing (check it out &#8211; <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2007/07/marketing-faceb.html">it&#8217;s the feed, stupid!)</a>.  I&#8217;ve been playing around with Facebook like Dave these past few weeks and trying to ramp my ultra n00b status up and think Dave&#8217;s hit a lot of key points.  One thing is that the Feed has some limitations that I&#8217;ve found recently that limit some of it&#8217;s godsend ability for app marketing within Facebook.  I&#8217;ll be posting more details soon.  Also one thing I noticed is that how early stage and unpolished most of the apps &#8211; it&#8217;s early for sure.  And that&#8217;s not a bad thing.</p>
<p>And now another pal &#8211; Scott Rafer is up to no good again <img src='http://sawickipedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   with Lookery according to <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/07/11/scott-rafer-is-facebooking-launching-lookery/">GigaOm</a> an ad network for facebook apps &#8211; assuming it can be expanded to all widgets &#8211; all I have to say is why didn&#8217;t I think of it first.  Great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sawickipedia.com/2007/07/11/facebook-apps-here-there-and-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
